[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081120093159.GA6885@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:31:59 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 36 of 38] xen: route hardware irqs via Xen
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PCI
> + irq = xen_register_gsi(gsi, triggering, polarity);
> + if ((int)irq >= 0)
> + return irq;
> +#endif
why not change irq to 'int' and avoid the cast?
also, please eliminate the #ifdef by turning xen_register_gsi() into a
'return -1' inline on !CONFIG_XEN_PCI.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PCI
> + xen_pci_init();
> +#endif
hide the #ifdef in a header please. (like you already properly do for
xen_setup_pirqs())
> + if (rc != 0) {
> if (!probing_irq(irq))
> printk(KERN_INFO "Failed to obtain physical IRQ %d\n",
> irq);
> + dump_stack();
generally it's better to use WARN() or WARN_ONCE() to get good debug
feedback and stackdumps. (they also document the reason for the dump)
> @@ -523,8 +526,6 @@
> } else
> irq = find_unbound_irq();
>
> - spin_unlock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
> -
> set_irq_chip_and_handler_name(irq, &xen_pirq_chip,
> handle_level_irq, "pirq");
hm, looks like a stray bugfix?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists