linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.28-rc5 07/11] kmemleak: Remove some of the kmemleak false positives

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081120120904.GD20724@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:09:04 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.28-rc5 07/11] kmemleak: Remove some of the kmemleak
	false positives


* Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:

>  	for (currcons = 0; currcons < MIN_NR_CONSOLES; currcons++) {
>  		vc_cons[currcons].d = vc = alloc_bootmem(sizeof(struct vc_data));
> +		/* kmemleak does not track the memory allocated via
> +		 * alloc_bootmem() but this block contains pointers to
> +		 * other blocks allocated via kmalloc */
> +		memleak_alloc(vc, sizeof(struct vc_data), 1);

Comment style - and that is true for other bits of your patchset too.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/