[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49256CCE.9060107@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:57:34 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, rminnich@...dia.gov,
ericvh@...il.com, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] poll: allow f_op->poll to sleep, take #2
f_op->poll is the only vfs operation which is not allowed to sleep.
It's because poll and select implementation used task state to
synchronize against wake ups, which doesn't have to be the case
anymore as wait/wake interface can now use custom wake up functions.
The non-sleep restriction can be a bit tricky because ->poll is not
called from an atomic context and the result of accidentally sleeping
in ->poll only shows up as temporary busy looping when the timing is
right or rather wrong.
This patch converts poll/select to use custom wake up function and use
separate triggered variable to synchronize against wake up events.
The only added overhead is an extra function call during wake up and
negligible.
This patch removes the one non-sleep exception from vfs locking rules
and is beneficial to userland filesystem implementations like FUSE, 9p
or peculiar fs like spufs as it's very difficult for those to
implement non-sleeping poll method.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>
Cc: Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
---
I forgot to cc LKML when posting the patch. Resending for reference.
This patch has been acked by Linus and is scheduled to go through
Miklos' tree.
The original exchange reproduced below.
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Updated to fit hrtimer changes. 9p changes are already merged, so
>> this patch is sufficient to allow all ->poll implementations to
>> sleep. spufs is broken without this change && future FUSE change
>> requires this. If there's no objection, I'd like to push this
>> along with other FUSE changes. Linus, are you still against this
>> change?
>
> Hmm. Looks ok to me.
>
>> FYI, the previous discussion on this subject can be found at...
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/726176/focus=726178
>>
Thanks.
Documentation/filesystems/Locking | 2 -
drivers/media/video/v4l1-compat.c | 4 ---
fs/select.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
include/linux/poll.h | 9 ++++++
4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Index: work/fs/select.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/fs/select.c
+++ work/fs/select.c
@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static void __pollwait(struct file *filp
void poll_initwait(struct poll_wqueues *pwq)
{
init_poll_funcptr(&pwq->pt, __pollwait);
+ pwq->polling_task = current;
pwq->error = 0;
pwq->table = NULL;
pwq->inline_index = 0;
@@ -145,9 +146,8 @@ void poll_freewait(struct poll_wqueues *
EXPORT_SYMBOL(poll_freewait);
-static struct poll_table_entry *poll_get_entry(poll_table *_p)
+static struct poll_table_entry *poll_get_entry(struct poll_wqueues *p)
{
- struct poll_wqueues *p = container_of(_p, struct poll_wqueues, pt);
struct poll_table_page *table = p->table;
if (p->inline_index < N_INLINE_POLL_ENTRIES)
@@ -159,7 +159,6 @@ static struct poll_table_entry *poll_get
new_table = (struct poll_table_page *) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
if (!new_table) {
p->error = -ENOMEM;
- __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
return NULL;
}
new_table->entry = new_table->entries;
@@ -171,20 +170,51 @@ static struct poll_table_entry *poll_get
return table->entry++;
}
+static int pollwake(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key)
+{
+ struct poll_wqueues *pwq = wait->private;
+ DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(dummy_wait, pwq->polling_task);
+
+ set_mb(pwq->triggered, 1);
+
+ /* perform the default wake up operation */
+ return default_wake_function(&dummy_wait, mode, sync, key);
+}
+
/* Add a new entry */
static void __pollwait(struct file *filp, wait_queue_head_t *wait_address,
poll_table *p)
{
- struct poll_table_entry *entry = poll_get_entry(p);
+ struct poll_wqueues *pwq = container_of(p, struct poll_wqueues, pt);
+ struct poll_table_entry *entry = poll_get_entry(pwq);
if (!entry)
return;
get_file(filp);
entry->filp = filp;
entry->wait_address = wait_address;
- init_waitqueue_entry(&entry->wait, current);
+ init_waitqueue_func_entry(&entry->wait, pollwake);
+ entry->wait.private = pwq;
add_wait_queue(wait_address, &entry->wait);
}
+int poll_schedule_timeout(struct poll_wqueues *pwq, int state,
+ ktime_t *expires, unsigned long slack)
+{
+ int rc = -EINTR;
+
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ if (!pwq->triggered)
+ rc = schedule_hrtimeout_range(expires, slack, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+
+ /* clear triggered for the next iteration */
+ pwq->triggered = 0;
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(poll_schedule_timeout);
+
/**
* poll_select_set_timeout - helper function to setup the timeout value
* @to: pointer to timespec variable for the final timeout
@@ -340,8 +370,6 @@ int do_select(int n, fd_set_bits *fds, s
for (;;) {
unsigned long *rinp, *routp, *rexp, *inp, *outp, *exp;
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-
inp = fds->in; outp = fds->out; exp = fds->ex;
rinp = fds->res_in; routp = fds->res_out; rexp = fds->res_ex;
@@ -411,10 +439,10 @@ int do_select(int n, fd_set_bits *fds, s
to = &expire;
}
- if (!schedule_hrtimeout_range(to, slack, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS))
+ if (!poll_schedule_timeout(&table, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
+ to, slack))
timed_out = 1;
}
- __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
poll_freewait(&table);
@@ -666,7 +694,6 @@ static int do_poll(unsigned int nfds, s
for (;;) {
struct poll_list *walk;
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
for (walk = list; walk != NULL; walk = walk->next) {
struct pollfd * pfd, * pfd_end;
@@ -709,10 +736,9 @@ static int do_poll(unsigned int nfds, s
to = &expire;
}
- if (!schedule_hrtimeout_range(to, slack, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS))
+ if (!poll_schedule_timeout(wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, slack))
timed_out = 1;
}
- __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
return count;
}
Index: work/include/linux/poll.h
===================================================================
--- work.orig/include/linux/poll.h
+++ work/include/linux/poll.h
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ struct poll_table_entry {
struct poll_wqueues {
poll_table pt;
struct poll_table_page * table;
+ struct task_struct * polling_task;
+ int triggered;
int error;
int inline_index;
struct poll_table_entry inline_entries[N_INLINE_POLL_ENTRIES];
@@ -64,6 +66,13 @@ struct poll_wqueues {
extern void poll_initwait(struct poll_wqueues *pwq);
extern void poll_freewait(struct poll_wqueues *pwq);
+extern int poll_schedule_timeout(struct poll_wqueues *pwq, int state,
+ ktime_t *expires, unsigned long slack);
+
+static inline int poll_schedule(struct poll_wqueues *pwq, int state)
+{
+ return poll_schedule_timeout(pwq, state, NULL, 0);
+}
/*
* Scaleable version of the fd_set.
Index: work/drivers/media/video/v4l1-compat.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/media/video/v4l1-compat.c
+++ work/drivers/media/video/v4l1-compat.c
@@ -203,7 +203,6 @@ static int poll_one(struct file *file, s
table = &pwq->pt;
for (;;) {
int mask;
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
mask = file->f_op->poll(file, table);
if (mask & POLLIN)
break;
@@ -212,9 +211,8 @@ static int poll_one(struct file *file, s
retval = -ERESTARTSYS;
break;
}
- schedule();
+ poll_schedule(pwq, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
}
- set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
poll_freewait(pwq);
return retval;
}
Index: work/Documentation/filesystems/Locking
===================================================================
--- work.orig/Documentation/filesystems/Locking
+++ work/Documentation/filesystems/Locking
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ prototypes:
};
locking rules:
- All except ->poll() may block.
+ All may block.
BKL
llseek: no (see below)
read: no
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists