[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <49259561.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:50:41 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@...lshack.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Cyrill Gorcunov" <gorcunov@...il.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Glauber Costa" <gcosta@...hat.com>,
"Matt Mackall" <mpm@...enic.com>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: clean up after: move entry_64.S register
savingout of the macros
>>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> 20.11.08 16:39 >>>
>movq_cfi for the frame construction direction and movq_cfi_restore for
>the frame deconstruction phase sounds like a good naming compromise, hm?
How about movq_spill and movq_fill (losely following some ia64 terminology)?
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists