linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] cpu alloc cleanups and implementation improvement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811201030240.19948@quilx.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:35:05 -0600 (CST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] cpu alloc cleanups and implementation improvement

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Rusty Russell wrote:

>   I've argued with Christoph that his implementation contains gratuitous
> obsolescence of perfectly-good APIs; hopefully providing real patches will
> give us a more useful debate.

I would not mind if you would take over from here. It seems that I
am into too many things again. Then you can also do the lower
casing that I find inconsistent.

> I hope this adds some light,

As I pointed out before there are numerous semantic differences that I
noted before. For the transition period where the percpu allocator has a
fixed area there will be issues with an immediate conversion because the
existing allocpercpu allows unbounded allocations and the cpualloc does
not.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/