[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hzlju8h00.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:05:51 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Luc Verhaegen <lverhaegen@...e.de>,
Egbert Eich <eich@...e.de>
Subject: Re: vm86 segfaults with NX bit
At Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:01:08 +0100,
I wrote:
>
> At Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:58:44 -0800,
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:39:06 +0100
> > Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > X guys reported that VESA driver segfaults in vm86 mode with a kernel
> > > with CONFIG_X86_PAE, and it turned to be the NX bit. See Novell
> > > bugzilla #443440:
> > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443440
> > >
> > > I can confirm that the latest 2.6.28-rc still causes the same problem,
> > > and it disappears when booted with noexec=off option.
> > >
> > > Also, when NX bit is reset for the first 1MB (or smaller) in
> > > do_sys_vm86(), it also works as expected. But I have little clue
> > > where to restore the bit again.
> > >
> > > Any good suggestions / solutions?
> > >
> >
> > did the code that mapped this memory setup use PROT_EXEC ?
>
> A good question...
> Luc, Egbert, how does VESA driver handle it?
Just looking through the vesa directory of xorg-server code, PROT_EXEC
is passed for all mappings, at least.
Please correct me if I'm looking at a wrong place...
thanks,
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists