linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: clean up after: move entry_64.S register saving out of the macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:24:06 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
	Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: clean up after: move entry_64.S register saving
	out of the macros


* Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com> wrote:

> Does not work... But if you are attached to the underscores, I think 
> we can force it to work by using CPP to convert it to something the 
> assembler does parse right:
> 
> #define pushq_cfi pushq.cfi
> 
> etc?
> 
> Or is that just too ugly?

changed it to pushq.cfi / popq.cfi / movq.cfi - does that read OK to 
you? It looks fine here.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/