[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1zlju9u9z.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:33:44 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: mtk.manpages@...il.com
Cc: "Serge Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
"Subrata Modak" <subrata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-man@...r.kernel.org,
clg@...ibm.com, herbert@...hfloor.at, dev@...ru
Subject: Re: Current state of CLONE_NEWUSER?
"Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com> writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Eric W. Biederman
> <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>> "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Serge,
>>>
>>> What is the current status of CLONE_NEWUSER? I'm currently trying to
>>> test this flag in preparation for documenting it in the clone(2) man
>>> page, but am running into an ENOMEM error from the clone() call, which
>>> seems to occur after a failure in kobject_init_and_add() in the
>>> following call sequence:
>>>
>>> clone_user_ns() --> alloc_uid() --> uids_user_create() -->
>>> kobject_init_and_add()
>>>
>>> Are there already some test programs somewhere? Is there any
>>> documentation already available for this flag?
>>
>> This code is definitely still under development.
>>
>> When complete it should be able to create a new uid namespace,
>> as an unprivileged user. Creating a new process with uid == gid == 0.
>> Have a full set of caps. And have permission to do nothing on the system
>> except read world readable files and write world writable files.
>
> Thanks for the info,
>
> So the error I described is expected?
I don't think so. Serge?
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists