linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] powerpc: port of dynamic ftrace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081120081307.GD21785@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:13:07 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] powerpc: port of dynamic ftrace

* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> ----
>  arch/powerpc/Kconfig              |    2 +
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h |   14 +-
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/module.h |   16 ++-
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c      |  473 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c        |    5 +
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/module_32.c   |   10 +
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c   |   13 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h     |    9 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c          |  168 +++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/ftrace.h            |   51 ++++-
>  kernel/module.c                   |    2 +-
>  kernel/trace/ftrace.c             |  137 ++++++------
>  scripts/recordmcount.pl           |   20 ++-
>  13 files changed, 790 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)

Hm, something like this shouldnt be pulled into the powerpc tree: it 
touches the core kernel, x86 code and ftrace code as well.

Please do the suggestion i outlined and which Paul agreed with: 
prepare a branch that touches _only_ powerpc files and gets these 
changes there, without actually breaking the build on powerpc. And 
please do not name the branch as "hack" - we dont want Paul to pull 
such a branch name - it will show up in the upstream git logs.

Those changes should only touch powerpc files. Do not try to shoe-horn 
already applied ftrace commits into a separate branch with different 
sha1's. Yes, ftrace wont be enable-able on powerpc when that is 
pulled, but it will only be for a brief period shortly before the 
merge window. (and it will all just work fine when integrated 
together)

Once this branch is done, and once Paul agrees that it looks OK-ish to 
him, we can put it into ftrace-next straight away [but still keep it 
in a separate topic tree in tip/tracing/powerpc - so it can all be 
reconsidered reversibly if it causes too much merge trouble]. Paul 
will then be able to pull it in a few weeks, in the runup to the 
v2.6.29 merge window.

The other option is to go the slow route of 2-3 kernel releases to 
pull this all off.

ok?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/