[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081120082013.GF21785@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:20:13 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, rmk@....linux.org.uk, starvik@...s.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, takata@...ux-m32r.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
grundler@...isc-linux.org, paulus@...ba.org,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, lethal@...ux-sh.org, wli@...omorphy.com,
davem@...emloft.net, jdike@...toit.com, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpumask: centralize cpu_online_map and
cpu_possible_map
* Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> (I'll be rinsing this through linux-next; testing feedback and even
> Acked-by's appreciated).
>
> Each SMP arch defines these themselves. Move them to a central
> location.
>
> Twists:
> 1) Some archs (m32, parisc, s390) set possible_map to all 1, so we add a
> CONFIG_INIT_ALL_POSSIBLE for this rather than break them.
>
> 2) mips and sparc32 '#define cpu_possible_map phys_cpu_present_map'.
> Those archs simply have phys_cpu_present_map replaced everywhere.
>
> 3) Alpha defined cpu_possible_map to cpu_present_map; this is tricky
> so I just manipulate them both in sync.
>
> 4) IA64, cris and m32r have gratuitous 'extern cpumask_t cpu_possible_map'
> declarations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Nice cleanup - my earlier acked-by for this concept still stands:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists