[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49267BF0.3080806@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:14:24 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] fix CGROUP VS RCU
Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:49:13 +0800 Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>>> current some cgroup struct are protected by RCU.
>>>
>>> struct protected by RCU:
>>> struct css_set, struct cgroup_subsys_state, struct cgroup
>>>
>>> pointer protected by RCU:
>>> struct task_struct.cgroups, struct css_set.subsys[*],
>>> struct cgroup_subsys_state.cgroup
>>> the last two pointers are readonly pointer!
>>>
>>> these patches are fix these structs, and pointers. And a faker:
>>> struct cgroup_subsys.root
>>>
>>> Not cleanup all yet.
>>>
>> These patches aren't sequence numbered. In what order should they be
>> applied?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> No order number, they are dependent(except 2 patches which have order number).
dependent --> independent
>
> Lai.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists