| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <49268876.7080303@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:07:50 +0900 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] FUSE: extend FUSE to support more operations, take #2 Hello, Miklos. Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Hi Tejun, > > On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Tejun Heo wrote: >> This patchset is the second take of extend-FUSE patchset. Changes >> from the last take[L] are... > > I managed to review and apply this and the libfuse patches up to the > ioctl support. After swithing _IOC_READ with _IOC_WRITE in the kernel > the example program actually worked :) Did I get that wrong? Looking at it again.... oops. It's reverse alright. Thanks for catching it. > I removed ->unrestricted_ioctl() and associated code because it really > doesn't make any sense: the high level lib won't be used for CUSE > stuff, otherwise unrestrited ioctls are not allowed (and the interface > is rather horrible anyway). Well, CUSE highlevel interface piggy backs on FUSE so it requires unrestricted_ioctl() there for it and ossp does use it. > The poll patches look OK at a first glance too, I'll review them > tomorrow. Alright, thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists