[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18617.1227263040@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:24:00 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, trond.myklebust@....uio.no,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/45] Create a dynamically sized pool of threads for doing very slow work items [ver #41]
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> umm, if they're slow, why not create a kernel thread per operation?
> Why add the thread pool?
Because if someone does a tar of, say, a kernel tree, that'll create one
thread per file... This provides a limiter - and makes sure there are threads
immediately available.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists