[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081121170321.GH733@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:03:21 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] DMA-API debugging facility
* Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 04:54:52PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 17:26 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > this patchset introduces code to debug drivers usage of the DMA-API.
> > > Tests with hardware IOMMUs have shown several bugs in drivers
> > > regarding the usage of that API.
> > > Problems were found especially in network card drivers.
> >
> > This is really useful -- but surely it shouldn't be x86-specific?
> >
> > All the code except the hooks in the architecture's dma_map_single() et
> > al functions could be generic, couldn't it?
>
> Yes, in principle we could move most of it to generic code. There is
> nothing architecture specific in it. Anybody who prefers this to be
> arch/x86 before moving it to lib/?
yeah, we want to make it generic once it works.
but my comments about the allocation needs to be addressed (see my
comments on [03/10]), and solving that will likely impact the
structure of the approach in a way that will generalize it anyway, as
a side-effect.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists