[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4926F085.4060903@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:31:49 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
CC: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu,
rminnich@...dia.gov, ericvh@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] poll: allow f_op->poll to sleep, take #2
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> For both, I was trying to stay consistent with the environment. I
>> find mixed styles in close proximity much uglier than slightly
>> different but consistent style. Eh... Is the consensus checkpatch or
>> die?
>
> I think some common sense can be applied in these cases. For example
> a small amount of offending style in close proximity can be fixed as
> well, as long as it doesn't interfere too much with the readability of
> the patch.
Well, yeah, given that fs/select.c is not a very hot file. Introduced
inconsistencies are gonna stay there for a long time. The two issues
in this patch is minor and can be easily adjusted but in general I'm
not too sure whether always sticking with checkpatch is a good idea
especially on fairly cold areas. Anyways, I'll fix it up.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists