[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0811211307550.3179@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:11:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...u.dk>
cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@...x.dk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Regression: Bisected, IRQ and MSI allocations screwed without
sparse irq
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > Ok, I queue it for mainline. This solves just the number of irqs
> > limitation, the rmmod problem still persists, right ?
>
> It solves both the irq limit and the NIU driver unload bug.
I don't believe that it solves it. It hides it at the best.
> We should give it a good description.
> I have cooked up a patch with a description below, will you accept that?
>
> Who's tree do you want it to go upsteam via?
> (You are listed as one of the X86 maintainers, but Ingo's tree seems more
> up-to-date. My patch below is agains DaveM's tree)
I queued it already with a description of the irq nr. problem.
The rmmod problem is something different and should be investigated
thoroughly instead of declaring it solved by magic.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists