[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811211832460.7797@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:33:52 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, tytso@....edu, arjan@...radead.org,
srostedt@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] trace: profile all if conditionals
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > +#define if(cond) if (__builtin_constant_p((cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
>
> wheee...
>
> Now how are you going to profile ?:, while, for(;expr;), etc? ;)
I don't know. Give me a few months, I'll figure out a way ;-)
This is just a way to see if we should add or remove more if annotations.
(i.e. likely() and unlikey() )
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists