linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH fwd] poll: allow f

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4927FE87.6050005@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:43:51 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
CC:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	arjan@...ux.intel.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	hch@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, rminnich@...dia.gov,
	ericvh@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH fwd] poll: allow f_op->poll to sleep

Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 09:58:33AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> +int poll_schedule_timeout(struct poll_wqueues *pwq, int state,
>> +			  ktime_t *expires, unsigned long slack)
> 
> All callers of poll_schedule() and poll_schedule_timeout() pass
> TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE.  We can elide the 'state' argument.

Well, I wanted to keep it as to keep it more consistent with other
schedule() functions but both Miklos and you don't seem to like it, so I
might as well just drop it.  Andrew, what do you think?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/