linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET] FUSE: extend FUSE to support more operations, take #2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4927B7E3.8090006@kernel.org>
Date:	Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:42:27 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] FUSE: extend FUSE to support more operations, take
 #2

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Miklos.
> 
> Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> Hi Tejun,
>>
>> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> This patchset is the second take of extend-FUSE patchset.  Changes
>>> from the last take[L] are...
>> I managed to review and apply this and the libfuse patches up to the
>> ioctl support.  After swithing _IOC_READ with _IOC_WRITE in the kernel
>> the example program actually worked :)
> 
> Did I get that wrong?  Looking at it again.... oops.  It's reverse
> alright.  Thanks for catching it.

Now I know why it happened.  I caught the bug and fixed during testing
but the fix ended up in the following patch of implement-CUSE patchset.

  [PATCH 2/5] FUSE: export symbols to be used by CUSE

So, with it fixed in the right place, the above patch will produce one
reject.  I'll post a regenerated one.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/