[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081123175125.GA32472@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:51:25 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC -tip] x86: introduce ENTRY(KPROBE)_X86 assembly helpers to catch unbalanced declaration
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 07:57:11PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> It's usefull to catch unbalanced, missed or mixed declarations of ENTRY and
> KPROBES. These macros would help a bit (at least I hope so).
>
> For example the following code would compile without problems
>
> ENTRY_X86(mcount)
> retq
> END_X86(mcount)
>
> But if you forget and mix the following form
>
> ENTRY_X86(mcount)
> retq
> END(mcount)
>
> ENTRY_X86(ftrace_caller)
>
> The assembler will issue the following message:
> Error: ENTRY_X86/KPROBE_X86 unbalanced,missed,mixed
>
> Actually the checking is performed at every _X86 macro
> so maybe it's good idea to put ENTRY_KPROBE_FINAL_X86
> at the end of .S file to be sure you didn't miss anything.
Could we at least try this out in -next before we decide to make
this X86 only?
I am aware that binutils can be a bit fragile but -next testing should
make a good check on this.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists