[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081123213855.GB16613@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:38:55 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] trace: profile all if conditionals
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Nov 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> writes:
>
> > > This adds a significant amount of overhead and should only be
> > > used by those analyzing their system.
> >
> > Often this can be also done using CPU performance counters. Might
> > be a cheaper option.
>
> I'd love to add an option that could hook into any arch with HW
> support for this. We could dump out the same information, but just a
> different way to gather it. But I'm still ignorant to the use of
> CPU performance counters and how to find which branch matches which
> if.
there's already new ftrace code for this and the patches are done -
stay tuned.
but it wont be a replacement for the soft method (which is more
flexible - the hw can only do 'all or nothing' type of branch
tracing), so it's complementary.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists