linux-kernel - Re: Why does the md/raid subsystem does not remap bad sectors in a raid array?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4928DD4C.4020301@wasp.net.au>
Date:	Sun, 23 Nov 2008 08:34:20 +0400
From:	Brad Campbell <brad@...p.net.au>
To:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
CC:	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why does the md/raid subsystem does not remap bad sectors in
 a raid   array?

Robert Hancock wrote:
>> The controller does not drop the drive from the array when it hits an 
>> error, the 3ware card "takes care of it" and the user need not worry 
>> about it, whereas with md/raid every time it hits a bad sector, it 
>> breaks the raid and it goes degraded, is this correct?  Will/can 
>> something like what 3ware does be possible in a sw-raid based 
>> configuration or is a HW raid card required?
> 
> Presumably all it's doing is writing that sector's contents back from 
> the other drive(s) in the array when the read error is detected, this is 
> something that software could do just as well. Drives only remap bad 
> sectors when they are written over, as a read failure doesn't 
> necessarily mean that the sector is entirely unreadable, but could be 
> due to environmental factors such as high temperature, vibration, etc.
> 
> Just rewriting the sector seems a bit questionable though, as if a drive 
> in your array is growing read errors that's not really a good thing..

md has done this for a while now though. If it encounters a read error in the array it will make an 
attempt to write the reconstructed data back to that disk attempting to force a reallocation. I've 
seen it work quite well here on disks that have the occasional grown defect.

It's certainly _much_ nicer than having the disk booted from the array on a single read error.

If the disk is haemorrhaging sectors then you will find out about it sooner or later through other 
means.

Brad
-- 
Dolphins are so intelligent that within a few weeks they can
train Americans to stand at the edge of the pool and throw them
fish.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/