[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081123100534.GB29843@shareable.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:05:34 +0000
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBIFS: endian handling fixes and annotations
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >- return le32_to_cpu(key->u32[1]) >> UBIFS_S_KEY_BLOCK_BITS;
> >+ return le32_to_cpu(key->j32[1]) >> UBIFS_S_KEY_BLOCK_BITS;
>
> If you would change such references to something like
> |return le32_to_cpup(&key->j32[1]) >> UBIFS_S_KEY_BLOCK_BITS;
> then on powerpc
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 155384 1284 24 156692 26414 ubifs-b4.ko
> 155372 1284 24 156680 26408 ubifs-after.ko
>
> because now it is possible to load the value as LE from memory instead
> of loading it BE and swapping it afterwads.
If le32_to_cpu used __builtin_bswap32 (a GCC builtin), wouldn't
GCC do this trivial optimisation itself?
-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists