[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <492938A4.9020502@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:04:04 +0200
From: Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: srostedt@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, sandmann@...mi.au.dk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tracing/stack-tracer: fix locking
On 2008-11-23 13:01, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On 2008-11-23 12:52, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>>> * Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> + down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>>>> + vma = find_vma(mm, ip);
>>>> if (vma) {
>>>> file = vma->vm_file;
>>>> vmstart = vma->vm_start;
>>>> }
>>>> + up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>>>> }
>>>> if (file) {
>>>> ret = trace_seq_path(s, &file->f_path);
>>>>
>>>>
>>> and now it's "file" that is held without a reference and possibly
>>> racy.
>>>
>>>
>> I'll move the (file) inside the mmap_sem too, since file is part of
>> vma, and you need mmap_sem to access the vma nobody can modify
>> (file) if they don't hold mmap_sem. Am I right?
>>
>
> yeah - you can use the mm lock for that as the vma holds a reference
> to the file. This works as long as none of the seq functions called
> with this lock held can provoke a user pagefault (they shouldnt, but i
> havent checked in detail).
>
It calls d_path, that access only kernel structures AFAICT, so it can't
provoke a *user* pagefault.
Not sure about kernel pagefaults, but they shouldn't matter.
Best regards,
--Edwin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists