[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081124205512.26C1.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:11:28 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, ltt-dev@...ts.casi.polymtl.ca,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
Subject: Re: [ltt-dev] [RFC PATCH] Poll : add poll_wait_set_exclusive (fixing thundering herd problem in LTTng)
> > I fully agreed this feature is needed.
> > Actually, I've made similar patch at one years ago.
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120257050719087&w=2
> >
> >
> > but, I have one question.
> > My version have epoll support, but yours donesn't have.
> > Is it intensionally?
> >
> > this is just dumb question, it doesn't mean any objection.
>
> Hrm, actually, your patch seems cleaner than mine, but it adds a branch
> in the standard hotpath, which mine does not do (but I am not sure it is
> such an important optimization...).
Why do you think poll_wait() is hotpath?
I think sysm_poll() isn't hotpath because it often cause task sleeping.
> Is there any reason why your patch
> did not get merged ?
my patch was developed for a part of mem_notify patch series.
but the mem_notify was naked by akpm.
therefore it lost merging motivation ;-)
Ingo, I'll rebase and post my patch for -tip tommorow.
Could you please review it?
> The only reason I did not make a epoll version is simply because LTTng
> currently does not support it. :)
thanks.
I understand your original intension.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists