linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/1] edac x38: new MC driver module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57C9024A16AD2D4C97DC78E552063EA35C517F42@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:18:13 -0800
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@...il.com>
CC:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Doug Thompson <norsk5@...oo.com>,
	"dougthompson@...ssion.com" <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] edac x38: new MC driver module

>       volatile u32 __iomem *__p = addr;
>       u32 __l, __h;

Do we really need all the "__" inside an inline function?  Why
not just call these "p", "l" and "h"?

-Tony