lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:09:01 +0100 From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> To: Jay Fenlason <fenlason@...hat.com> CC: linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: idr: IDs guaranteed to be less than 1<<31? (was Re: [PATCH] firewire: us an idr rather than a linked list for resources) Jay Fenlason wrote at linux1394-devel: > As mentioned in the comments, there is a theoretical problem with this > code if someone manages to allocate 2^31 resources on a 32-bit > machine, or 2^32+1 resources on a 64+-bit machine. The kerneldoc of idr_get_new() says that we only get IDs in the range of 0...0x7fffffff. But is this true with 64bit kernels? -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- =-== ==--- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists