linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:22:31 -0700
From:	Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zaitcev@...hat.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure

On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:41:32 -0800, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:

> > > > This reverts to the 2005 (pre- aafbf24a) behaviour where "nousb" was
> > > > not a module parameter, just a kernel command line parameter.  That's
> > > > more sensible anyway.

By the way, I floated the idea to remove "nousb" altogether on fedora-devel.
Alan Cox replied that he has an actual box that requires it,
because of a bug in SMM BIOS... Imagine my surprise. I think we're
stuck with "nousb" for a little while still.

-- Pete
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/