[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1227513364.3718.0.camel@penberg-laptop>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:56:04 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update the kmem_cache_create documentation regarding
the name parameter
Hi Catalin,
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 12:56 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> kmem_cache implementations like slub are allowed to merge multiple
> caches but only the initial name is preserved. Therefore,
> kmem_cache_name() is not guaranteed to return the same pointer passed to
> the former function. This patch updates the documentation to make this
> clearer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Applied, thanks!
> ---
> mm/slab.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> index 4887f1b..8924a03 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -2124,6 +2124,8 @@ static int __init_refok setup_cpu_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
> *
> * @name must be valid until the cache is destroyed. This implies that
> * the module calling this has to destroy the cache before getting unloaded.
> + * Note that kmem_cache_name() is not guaranteed to return the same pointer,
> + * therefore applications must manage it themselves.
> *
> * The flags are
> *
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists