[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081125085904.GA11191@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:59:04 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
ltt-dev@...ts.casi.polymtl.ca, Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: LTTng kernel integration roadmap, update
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 03:57:22AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> I agree that we should have a text-based output format for kernel
> hackers, as well as a binary high volume format. I'd argue also that
> since the text-based one would be used by kernel hackers, we don't
> need to worry so much about keeping the format absolutely stable from
> kernel version to kernel version (and it's not worth it to add version
> tags to the text stream); people who care about a long-term, stable
> interface should use the binary output format, IMHO.
>
> I'm not sure everyone will agree with me, but I think it helps to
> simplify the effort behind the text-based output.
Yes, agreed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists