linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][V4]Make get_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1227605300.1566.17.camel@penberg-laptop>
Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:28:20 +0200
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Rohit Seth <rohitseth@...gle.com>,
	akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][V4]Make get_user_pages interruptible

On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 15:21 -0800, Ying Han wrote:
> From: Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
> 
> make get_user_pages interruptible
> The initial implementation of checking TIF_MEMDIE covers the cases of OOM
> killing. If the process has been OOM killed, the TIF_MEMDIE is set and it
> return immediately. This patch includes:
> 
> 1. add the case that the SIGKILL is sent by user processes. The process can
> try to get_user_pages() unlimited memory even if a user process has sent a
> SIGKILL to it(maybe a monitor find the process exceed its memory limit and
> try to kill it). In the old implementation, the SIGKILL won't be handled
> until the get_user_pages() returns.
> 
> 2. change the return value to be ERESTARTSYS. It makes no sense to return
> ENOMEM if the get_user_pages returned by getting a SIGKILL signal.
> Considering the general convention for a system call interrupted by a
> signal is ERESTARTNOSYS, so the current return value is consistant to that.

Looks good to me (but I'm not the maintainer of this particular piece of
code).

Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>

You might want to add an explanation why we check both 'tsk' and
'current' in either in the patch description or as a comment, though. Or
just add a link to the mailing list archives in the description or
something.

> Signed-off-by:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
> Singed-off-by:	Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
  ^^^^^^

I'm sure you have a beautiful singing voice but from legal point of
view, it's probably better to just sign it off. ;-)

			Pekka

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/