[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081125191333.4273ae81@daedalus.pq.iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:13:33 +0200
From: Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>
To: "Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmiotrace: fix buffer overrun detection
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:59:22 +0100
"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> 2008/11/25 Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>:
> > Perhaps that:
> >
> > int trace_vprintk(unsigned long ip, const char *fmt, va_list args)
> > {
> > ......
> > if (tracing_disabled)
> > return 0;
>
> Since this is the return value for tracing_mark_write(), it may better
> return an error to avoid a spin when tracing
> is disabled. -ENODEV I guess, or -EBUSY
>
> The strange thing is that tracing_open_generic() shoud have return
> -ENODEV in this case during the opening of trace_mark.
>
This sounds worth investigating, thanks for the tip.
Hmm, maybe if I changed the current tracer while trace_enabled was
zero...
Anyway, this isn't too high on my priority list.
--
Pekka Paalanen
http://www.iki.fi/pq/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists