linux-kernel - RE: acpi_evaluate_integer broken by design

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308580DBD2E11@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:41:49 -0800
From:	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI mailing list <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: RE: acpi_evaluate_integer broken by design

I agree, it should be allocated on the stack, like it is most everywhere else.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: linux-acpi-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-acpi-
>owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Pavel Machek
>Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 3:05 AM
>To: kernel list; ACPI mailing list; Brown, Len
>Subject: acpi_evaluate_integer broken by design
>
>
>Now I know why I had strange "scheduling in atomic" problems:
>acpi_evaluate_integer() does malloc(..., irqs_disabled() ? GFP_ATOMIC
>: GFP_KERNEL)... which is (of course) broken.
>
>There's no way to reliably tell if we need GFP_ATOMIC or not from
>code, this one for example fails to detect spinlocks held.
>
>Fortunately, allocation seems small enough to be done on stack.
>
>Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
>
>diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
>index e827be3..f844941 100644
>--- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
>+++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
>@@ -259,34 +259,26 @@ acpi_evaluate_integer(acpi_handle handle
> 		      struct acpi_object_list *arguments, unsigned long long
>*data)
> {
> 	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
>-	union acpi_object *element;
>+	union acpi_object element;
> 	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { 0, NULL };
>
>-
> 	if (!data)
> 		return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
>
>-	element = kzalloc(sizeof(union acpi_object), irqs_disabled() ?
>GFP_ATOMIC: GFP_KERNEL);
>-	if (!element)
>-		return AE_NO_MEMORY;
>-
> 	buffer.length = sizeof(union acpi_object);
>-	buffer.pointer = element;
>+	buffer.pointer = &element;
> 	status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, pathname, arguments, &buffer);
> 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> 		acpi_util_eval_error(handle, pathname, status);
>-		kfree(element);
> 		return status;
> 	}
>
>-	if (element->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
>+	if (element.type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
> 		acpi_util_eval_error(handle, pathname, AE_BAD_DATA);
>-		kfree(element);
> 		return AE_BAD_DATA;
> 	}
>
>-	*data = element->integer.value;
>-	kfree(element);
>+	*data = element.integer.value;
>
> 	ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Return value [%llu]\n", *data));
>
>
>
>
>--
>(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
>(cesky, pictures)
>http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/