[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <492C6C9B.3060000@sandeen.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:22:35 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To: Stian Jordet <liste@...det.net>
CC: Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar@...net.de>, xfs@....sgi.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Extreme slowness with xfs [WAS: Re: Slowness with new pc]
Stian Jordet wrote:
> ti., 25.11.2008 kl. 01.09 +0100, skrev Sven-Haegar Koch:
>> I had the same problem when I tried it on my laptop (T60) - using it on
>> the unencrypted root filesystem (with /usr/src) took ages, using it on
>> the LUKS encrypted /home was blasing fast - on the same disk.
>>
>> This test was some time ago with something like 2.6.20 or 2.6.24 - I
>> gave up and reformatted / with ext3 as I needed the machine.
>>
>> I think barriers were the problem, they seem to cost performance like
>> hell, especially for operations with many small files. My laptop used
>> barriers for xfs on the direct partition, but not on crypto drivermapper
>> mounts.
>>
>> So perhaps try mounting with nobarrier and see if the speed problem goes
>> away - but know that you sacrifice some crash-resilience when doing so.
>
> Barriers were the problem indeed. My old system had no problems with
> barriers, but here it did an incredible difference.
Depending on the old system, perhaps its storage did not allow the
barriers to be honored, so after xfs saw a test barrier write fail at
mount time, it disabled them ... you'd see a message if that were the
case, FWIW.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists