| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <b6c5339f0811251329h1130fd4aladcbfda52f0542eb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:29:55 -0500 From: "Bob Copeland" <me@...copeland.com> To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@...eros.com> Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org, ath5k-devel@...ts.ath5k.org, bkuhn@...twarefreedom.org Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] License of changes to ath5k/ath9k On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@...eros.com> wrote: > We'll keep using the ath5k Changes-licensed-under tag until we get > advice from SFLC if we have done enough to ensure this is no longer > necessary. For ath9k, if we are not sure if you have read the > "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" we may ping you with an e-mail > just to be sure. I don't consider any of my changes significant enough to confer copyright, so by my Signed-off-by, I agree that whatever license the file currently has is alright by me. Even if the changes were significant, the previous holds. However, if everyone + SFLC prefers that we strictly use Changes-licensed-under even if we don't claim copyright, then I'll happily add the tag generator script to a git commit hook :) > Ps. Please do not open any can of worms here, this is just informational. Sure. I like the ath9k way, but really it doesn't matter that much. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists