[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0811261440330.3325@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:41:40 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: eranian@...glemail.com
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...e.hu, x86@...nel.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
eranian@...il.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: [patch 06/24] perfmon: generic x86 definitions (x86)
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, eranian@...glemail.com wrote:
> This patch adds definitions for the perfmon interrupt vector
> and thread info flags. It is common to i386 and x86_64 code.
> +#define TIF_PERFMON_WORK 9 /* work for pfm_handle_work() */
I can see the requirement for an apic vector, but why do you need a
TIF flag ?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists