[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081126145039.GA31043@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:50:39 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Philip Langdale <philipl@...rt.org>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sdhci-devel@...t.drzeus.cx, drzeus@...eus.cx, fseidel@...e.de,
weyland@...rary.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ricoh_mmc: Handle newer models of Ricoh controllers
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:42:20AM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> >>The latest generation of laptops are shipping with a newer
> >>model of Ricoh chip where the firewire controller is the
> >>primary PCI function but a cardbus controller is also present.
> >
> >Note that the current separate ricoh_mmc disabling module approach has
> >been shown to break during suspend/resume. Matthew Garret proposed a
> >patch for that which (with minor fixups) I tested successfully.
>
> Hmm. Well, I'm interested as to what Pierre thinks. He explicitly didn't
> want a quirk when we originally looked at the problem and that's why
> ricoh_mmc exists - but maybe this is a good enough reason to revisit that
> decision.
Thinking about it, it could possibly be handled by changing to
suspend_noirq and resume_noirq rather than the normal suspend and resume
functions? That ought to get the ordering constraints right. The problem
occurs when ricoh_mmc suspends before sdhci and resumes after it.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists