[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081126170851.GA24943@hallyn.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:08:51 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: mtk.manpages@...il.com
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>, Kir Kolyshkin <kir@...nvz.org>,
linux-man@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>,
Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@...l.net>
Subject: Re: Documentation for CLONE_NEWPID
Quoting Michael Kerrisk (mtk.manpages@...glemail.com):
> Hi Serge,
> > I assume you've considered the pros and cons of mentioning
> > signal semantics with respect to init tasks of child pid namespaces,
> > and decided it's not worth mentioning yet as the semantics are not
> > yet finalized?
> >
> > The goal is to treat the process as a system-wide init with respect
> > to signals coming from its own namespace, and treat it as an ordinary
> > task for signals coming from its ancestor namespaces. But as you've
> > probably read, the implementation may result in some unfortunate
> > side-effects regarding blocked signals etc.
>
> No I haven't considered this at all. Could you provide some pointers
> to relevant discussions on this?
The discussions are going on right now on lkml (see for instance
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/15/124). But I think Nadia has already
written something up. Nadia, could you send what you have to
Michael?
thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists