[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081126173113.GA30178@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:31:13 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: aperture_64.c: clarify that too small aperture is valid reason for this code
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 05:15:27PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > Clarify that too small aperture is valid reason for this code.
>
> There are lots more reasons than that, e.g. bad aperture pointing
> somewhere invalid. I'm not sure it makes sense to list them all.
Small aperture is not "obviously invalid" and it confused me for a
while, but...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists