[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081126175427.GE19881@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:54:27 -0800
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@...el.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"matthew@....cx" <matthew@....cx>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-IOV driver example 2/3] PF driver: integrate with SR-IOV
core
* Greg KH (greg@...ah.com) wrote:
> > +static int
> > +igb_virtual(struct pci_dev *pdev, int nr_virtfn)
> > +{
> > + unsigned char my_mac_addr[6] = {0x00, 0xDE, 0xAD, 0xBE, 0xEF, 0xFF};
> > + struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > + struct igb_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + if (nr_virtfn > 7)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> Why the check for 7? Is that the max virtual functions for this card?
> Shouldn't that be a define somewhere so it's easier to fix in future
> versions of this hardware? :)
IIRC it's 8 for the card, 1 reserved for PF. I think both notions
should be captured w/ commented constants.
thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists