[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081126124031.c709d597.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:40:31 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, will.newton@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-mm 3/7] unaligned: use generic implementation on
packed-struct arches
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:39:11 -0800
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> wrote:
> No functional changes, convert arches that use the packed-struct
> implementation for native-endianness and C byteshifting for the
> other endianness.
arch/sh has gone and changed things in linux-next.
> diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/unaligned.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/unaligned.h
> index c1641a0..abe2dd7 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/unaligned.h
> +++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/unaligned.h
> @@ -1,19 +1,6 @@
> #ifndef _ASM_SH_UNALIGNED_H
> #define _ASM_SH_UNALIGNED_H
>
> -/* SH can't handle unaligned accesses. */
> -#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
> -# include <linux/unaligned/le_struct.h>
> -# include <linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h>
> -# include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
> -# define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_le
> -# define put_unaligned __put_unaligned_le
> -#else
> -# include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h>
> -# include <linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h>
> -# include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
> -# define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_be
> -# define put_unaligned __put_unaligned_be
> -#endif
> +#include <asm-generic/unaligned.h>
>
> #endif /* _ASM_SH_UNALIGNED_H */
But this happened instead:
--- linux-2.6.28-rc6/arch/sh/include/asm/unaligned.h 2008-10-15 11:43:12.000000000 -0700
+++ 25/arch/sh/include/asm/unaligned.h 2008-11-26 12:32:18.000000000 -0800
@@ -1,7 +1,11 @@
#ifndef _ASM_SH_UNALIGNED_H
#define _ASM_SH_UNALIGNED_H
-/* SH can't handle unaligned accesses. */
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SH4A
+/* SH-4A can handle unaligned loads in a relatively neutered fashion. */
+#include <asm/unaligned-sh4a.h>
+#else
+/* Otherwise, SH can't handle unaligned accesses. */
#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
# include <linux/unaligned/le_struct.h>
# include <linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h>
@@ -15,5 +19,6 @@
# define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_be
# define put_unaligned __put_unaligned_be
#endif
+#endif
#endif /* _ASM_SH_UNALIGNED_H */
It's a bit sad to create a new variant of the sh unaligned accessors
while Harvey is madly tugging everything in the opposite direction.
I am tempted to revise the patch by just blowing away the above
changes, so the new unaligned-sh4a.h just doesn't get used by anything.
However...
commit accccfb3d8c2cb65baf7cdfc74a2da4cdeee65ab
Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Date: Wed Nov 26 00:29:58 2008 +0900
sh: Provide optimized unaligned loads on SH-4A.
This adds support for unaligned loads on SH-4A, using the SH-4A's
neutered movua.l instruction. As movua.l is r0-inspired, stores are
still handled through the packed struct.
Based on asm-generic/unaligned.h by Harvey Harrison.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
so I'll just drop the sh hunk from
unaligned-use-generic-implementation-on-packed-struct-arches.patch, I
think.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists