[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811261423120.5161@t2.domain.actdsltmp>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:35:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...escale.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
cc: avorontsov@...mvista.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of_gpio: Return GPIO flags from of_get_gpio()
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov writes:
>
>> Can we apply it? Paul, Benjamin?
>>
>> The patchwork url for this patch is:
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/6650/
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>> drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/net/phy/mdio-ofgpio.c | 4 ++--
>>> drivers/of/gpio.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>>> drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c | 2 +-
>>> include/linux/of_gpio.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
>>> 6 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> That would need acks from Jeff Garzik and David Woodhouse.
>
> Alternatively you could add a new function (called, for instance,
> of_get_gpio_flags) with the extra parameter to eliminate the need to
> change any drivers at this stage, since they all seem to pass NULL for
> the flags argument.
But if we did this every time any exported function needs to change, think
how bloated the API would be with cruft.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists