[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18733.56480.373527.669097@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:32:48 +1100
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...escale.com>
Cc: avorontsov@...mvista.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of_gpio: Return GPIO flags from of_get_gpio()
Trent Piepho writes:
> > Alternatively you could add a new function (called, for instance,
> > of_get_gpio_flags) with the extra parameter to eliminate the need to
> > change any drivers at this stage, since they all seem to pass NULL for
> > the flags argument.
>
> But if we did this every time any exported function needs to change, think
> how bloated the API would be with cruft.
I don't buy the argument that we can't add one thing because if we
added a hundred that would be too much. You could add
of_get_gpio_flags, get that upstream, then get the driver patches
upstream, then submit a patch to remove of_get_gpio. Alternatively
you could make of_get_gpio a macro or inline function in of_gpio.h.
If you really want to change everything in one hit you'll have to get
acks + agreement for the change to go upstream via my tree from all
the relevant driver maintainers first. I don't see any particular
advantage to doing it that way, though.
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists