lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081127112953.GA23702@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:29:53 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/function-branch-tracer: enhancements for the
	trace output


* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:

> On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 11:34 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Here is an example of the new output:
> > > 
> 
> > > CPU[000]  ------------8<---------- thread bash-2794 ------------8<----------
> 
> This is the most horrid thing I've ever seen.

Yeah, wanted to point that out too - but i started with the more 
commonly used (and most critical) printout portion: the function call 
graph itself.

> Please just put the comm/pid in another left column and leave a 
> plain "---" string for context switches.

That extra column should be a trace_option though - default-off. (it 
uses up quite some screen real estate) It would have to have a width 
of 14 characters to be practical:

    ssssssss-12345

mockup:

----------------------------------------------------------------
CPU)     task-PID   |     cost    |  function
----------------------------------------------------------------

  0)     bash-54320 |             |  sys_read() {
  0)     bash-54320 |    0.331 us |    fget_light();
  0)     bash-54320 |             |    vfs_read() {
  0) mycomman-1234  |             |      rw_verify_area() {
  0) mycomman-1234  |  121.444 us |        func();

Note some details:

1) longer comm names can be stripped off at 7 chars - 7 chars is 
   enough to recognize most of the things and the PID is good enough 
   for extra separation)

2) the ssssssss-12345 task identifier is _center_ aligned. It's a rare 
   alignment case but useful here: most people look at the command 
   portion and the whole string must be greppable and useful in traces 
   as an identifier - so right-aligning the PID is not a good 
   solution.

3) there's vertical separation after the task portion as well. This 
   helps us ignore the task portion when we want to look at only the 
   code and the cost of it. (the common case)

> comm/pid only in the separator is useless, you cannot grep stuff 
> like that, also, what's up with those '8's ?

yeah, that context-switch separator is horrible.

We can keep the separator, but as something saner, like:

---------------------------------------------------------
CPU)     cost    |  function
---------------------------------------------------------

  0)             |  sys_read() {
  0)    0.331 us |    fget_light();
  0)             |    vfs_read() {
  0)             |      rw_verify_area() {
  0)             |        security_file_permission() {
  0)    0.306 us |          cap_file_permission();
  0)    0.300 us |          cap_file_permission();
  0)    8.909 us |        }
  0)    0.993 us |      }
  0)   11.649 us |    }
  0)             |    do_sync_read() {
                 .   -------------------------
  0)             ==> [ bash-2794 => cat-1234 ]
                     -------------------------

  0)             |        __sock_recvmsg() {
  0)             |          security_socket_recvmsg() {
  0)  100.319 us |            cap_socket_recvmsg();
---------------------------------------------------------

Note the six small details:

1) '==>' sign put to the vertical separator. This shows that something 
   flow-intrusive (context-switch) happened.

2) The context-switch printout is in a little box that separates it 
   from the flow of the outgoing task.

3) there's an extra newline for the incoming flow. Context-switches 
   are usually attached to the outgoing flow - the incoming flow is 
   picked semi-randomly, so the newline is a visual separator for that 
   fact.

4) it uses the ssssssss-12345 taskname convention for both the 
   outgoing and the incoming task. That makes it greppable 
   generally.

5) the '----------' lines of the 'box' have no CPU nor task or cost 
   field. That makes it easy to grep them out - but they are still 
   helpful visual cues. They are variable length but that's solvable 
   by using an 'open box' simplification:

     0)    0.300 us |          cap_file_permission();
     0)    8.909 us |        }
     0)    0.993 us |      }
     0)   11.649 us |    }
     0)             |    do_sync_read() {
                    .   -----------------------------------
     0)             ==> [ bash-2794 => cat-1234
                        -----------------------------------

   Note how the box top and bottom is 35 characters, fixed. That looks 
   good with most task identifiers. Even in the worst-case length 
   length situation it looks good:

                    .   -----------------------------------
     0)             ==> [ mycomman-12345 => mycomman-12345
                        -----------------------------------

   Or it could be printed out variable length as well - it's a 
   solvable task :-)

6) note the small dot in the leadin to a context-switch: it's 
   intentional.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ