[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1227789156.4454.1519.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:32:36 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Rohit Seth <rohitseth@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1][PATCH]page_fault retry with NOPAGE_RETRY
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 14:21 +0200, Török Edwin wrote:
> How about distributing tasks to a set of worked threads, is the
> overhead of using IPC instead of mutexes/cond variables acceptable?
Inter process pthread mutexes should be very fast in the latest kernels
as they'll avoid the mmap_sem by use of get_user_pages_fast().
Not sure if pthread condition variables also work inter-process.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists