[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811270856580.18691@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:58:43 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] ring-buffer fix for 2.6.28
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > The following patch needs to go into 2.6.28. It protects against
> > a recursion race that can happen when the scheduler is traced.
> >
> > The following patches are in:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git
> >
> > branch: devel
> >
> >
> > Lai Jiangshan (1):
> > ring-buffer: prevent recursion
> >
> > ----
> > kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> Is there something about git that causes (or forces) the use of
> patch 0/1 followed by patch 1/1? I find it terribly unwanted.
>
It's my scripts that post. I should probably modify it so that if there is
only one patch, that I append it to the prolog instead, and mail it out
the old way. My scripts pull the patches out of my git tree and use quilt
top post. I know git has a way to do that too, but I have not set that up.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists