[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081127164754.GC22963@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:47:54 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, val.henson@...il.com, matthew@....cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] relatime: Allow making relatime the default behaviour
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 04:35:35PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> Putting in extra flags to allow the kernel and user space to fight each
> other over mount defaults is a recipe for disaster. Take your userspace
> mount command and beat it up appropriately. If you want a mount command
> that defaults to relatime then ship a mount command that does.
Yes, that sounds like a reasonable approach. In that case I'll update
the first to include the support for configuring the timeout.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists