linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: always define DECLARE_PCI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200811270904.13730.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:04:09 -0800
From:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: always define DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP* macros

On Thursday, November 27, 2008 3:45 am Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> wrote:
> > Currently these macros evaluate to a no-op except the kernel is
> > compiled with GART or Calgary support. But we also need these macros
> > when we have SWIOTLB, VT-d or AMD IOMMU in the kernel. Since we
> > always compile at least with SWIOTLB we can define these macros
> > always. This patch is also for stable backport for the same reason
> > the SWIOTLB default selection patch is.
> >
> > Cc: stable@...nel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/pci_64.h |   14 --------------
> >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> applied to tip/x86/urgent (for v2.6.28), as this is a DMA mapping
> bugfix for IOMMUs. If the AMD IOMMU is turned on in the .config but
> CONFIG_GART_IOMMU is off (a rare but possible combo), we'd leak on
> unmap and crash the box quickly.
>
> Jesse, is that path of upstream merge fine with you?

Yeah, that's fine with me.  OTOH removing config options generally seems like 
a good idea too, so maybe this combination should just be disallowed.  Or is 
there a good reason for this type of config?

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/