linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] relatime: Make relatime smarter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:06:15 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...hat.com, val.henson@...il.com, matthew@....cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] relatime: Make relatime smarter

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 04:59:29PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Make relatime smarter
>     
> Allow atime to be updated once per day even with relatime. This lets
> utilities like tmpreaper (which delete files based on last access time)
> continue working. The time between atime updates can be configured at boot
> with the relatime_interval kernel argument, or at runtime through /proc

Technically it's sysctl which just happens to be exposed in /proc..

> +	if (mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_RELATIME)
> +		if (!relatime_need_update(inode, now))
> +			goto out;
>  	if (timespec_equal(&inode->i_atime, &now))

Maybe rename relatime_need_update to atime_need_update and factor
this check into it?

Except for this nitpicks this seems extremly useful
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/