linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 2.6.27 1/1] gpiolib: add support for batch set of pins

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:43:31 +0800
From:	"Jaya Kumar" <jayakumar.lkml@...il.com>
To:	"Sam Ravnborg" <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	"David Brownell" <david-b@...bell.net>,
	"Eric Miao" <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
	"Eric Miao" <eric.miao@...vell.com>,
	"Haavard Skinnemoen" <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
	"Russell King" <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	"Ben Gardner" <bgardner@...tec.com>, "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2.6.27 1/1] gpiolib: add support for batch set of pins

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:51:27AM -0500, Jaya Kumar wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:15 PM, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 25 November 2008, Eric Miao wrote:
>> >> Using a bit mask will be more generic if the GPIOs are not contiguous.
>> >> Yet I still doubt this will be generic enough to be added to gpiolib.
>> >
>> > My expectation for this kind of mechanism was that systems who need
>> > to craft another parallel bus out of GPIO pins would be doing this
>> > with some system-specific utility functions.
>> >
>> > So my "is it generic enough" question is more at the level of "Are
>> > there enough Linux systems that need this sort of thing to justify
>> > generic support?".  I happen not to have come across the need for
>> > such ganged access from Linux (yet).  Whereas I've yet to use non-x86
>> > Linux systems that don't need to manipulate individual GPIO pins...
>>
>> I have come across the following scenarios where a bus set of gpio is useful:
>> - Broadsheet E-Ink controller (uses 16-bit data bus over GPIO)
>> framebuffer device (this patch is for this)
>> - Apollo/Hecuba E-Ink controller (uses 8-bit data bus over GPIO)
>> framebuffer device
>> - 8-bit parallel IO matrix LCD controllers, such as the Samsung KS108,
>> also Hitachi, etc
>
> We have such a system at work. And we need fast acces to the gpio pins
> when updating the LCD.
> I have not written/looked to deep at the code I just recall it was
> a bit messy and not something I would be proud of submitting to any ML.
>
>        Sam
>

Okay. Please help me understand in case I misunderstood. Are you
saying the code that I posted is too messy? To me, actually I am proud
of it. :-) But if some parts look messy, I'm happy to work on
improving it. I will need some advice though and please advise me on
which parts look messy.

Thanks,
jaya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/